iris vs the DIY stack
iris vs Apollo + ChatGPT + Mailchimp + your social tab.
why iris?
one tool, one inbox
the DIY stack lives across at least four tools. iris keeps discovery, drafting, sending, and reply tracking in one place, with conversations threaded per contact regardless of channel.
drafting wired to discovery
in the DIY stack, ChatGPT doesn't know who's on your Apollo list. iris drafts each message with the discovery context already attached - role, recent activity, fit signals - so the message reads like you actually looked at the contact.
no copy-paste between tools
every handoff in the DIY stack is a place data goes missing - export to CSV, paste into prompt, copy back, push to mailer, click around to find the reply. iris removes the handoffs.
social DMs natively
the DIY stack treats Instagram and Twitter as 'the social tab' you check between emails. iris treats them as channels with the same drafting and reply-tracking as email.
feature comparison
| feature | iris | the DIY stack |
|---|---|---|
| single tool to manage | ||
| drafting context-aware of discovery data | manual | |
| unified inbox across email + social | ||
| approval queue across all channels | ||
| fit-scored contact discovery | manual filtering | |
| API access for AI agents | ||
| complete control over each tool | ||
| lower up-front software cost | depends on stack |
the verdict
the DIY stack gives you flexibility and low upfront cost - if you're sending small volumes and don't mind the context-switching, it works. iris is for when the handoffs become the bottleneck: you're losing track of replies, your drafts are generic because ChatGPT doesn't have the contact context, and your inbox is three browser tabs deep.
ready to get started?
sign up in seconds. free to start, no credit card required.